Ian Johnston of Independent.co.uk attacks an article attempting to describe global warming’s worst-case scenario for painting an ‘overly bleak picture by overstating some of the science’.

Brian Kahn of Climate Central discusses a new report that shows greenhouse gases’ influence on the climate has increased 40 percent since 1990.

Graham Readfern for The Guardian explains how as a Trump appointee  pushes for televised slanging match, a New York magazine cover story sparks a different debate. 

John Timmer from arstechnica.com explains why scientists are arguing against worst case scenarios of climate change. 

David Templeton of The Pittsburgh Post Gazette explains how a Delaware-sized ice mass from Antartica shows a process is in place to double the rise in sea levels […]

Graham LLoyd, writer for The Australian, explains how some climate models were wrong are need to be updated to better reflect the results of satellite temperature measurements […]

Alexander C. Kaufman and Chris D’Angelo of Huffington Post explain why many scientists, former agency officials, and House Democrats are not excited for the new program.

Gavin Bade, writing for Utility Dive, explains how EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt will use ‘red team, blue team’ exercises to conduct a lengthy review of climate science. 

Andrew Kreighbaum of Inside Higher Ed discusses how professors and others withs cience backgrounds are running for Congress, to try and reverse Trump and Republican leaders policies.

Samantha Page explains why Trump’s Energy Week is not working scientists.

Seth Borenstein, AP Science Writer for U.S. News writes about an extensive first-of-its-kind study says global warming is likely to hit southern and poorer US counties harder.